Increasing the price of fuels is the best way to solve pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement?
Recently, the phenomenon of solving pollution problems and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of the fuel's price are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that agreeing to increase fuel prices can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, solved pollution problems can supply the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as the advantages of brilliant ways, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of increasing the fuel's price. Thus, beneficial ramifications of contaminated fuels are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, the pollution crisis can provide the community with negative impacts, which are associated with the reality that the demerits of atrocious approaches are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described increasing the price of fuels. Hence, predicted outcomes of air pollution are critical.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of solving pollution problems far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of efficient ways prove the significance of increased fuel prices, but also pinpoint possible implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-04 | Alireza.r.m | 88 | view |
| 2020-02-26 | Alireza.r.m | 80 | view |
- It is important for children to study a film at school to learn literature To what extent you agree Give example 11
- Increasing the price of fuels is the best way to solve pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement 88
- It is important for children to study a film at school to learn literature To what extent you agree Give example 88
- School children nowadays are not playing more sports compared to their parents in their childhood Do you agree or disagree Support your ideas with examples 90
- Soon retirement of workers can create job opportunities for young people Discuss Give examples 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1294.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 229.0 242.827586207 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65065502183 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14823237073 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 139.433497537 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646288209607 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3631016012 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.636363636 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8181818182 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304892757015 0.242375264174 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0978447013932 0.0925447433944 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.033949286021 0.071462118173 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16944241245 0.151781067708 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265487935581 0.0609392437508 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.77 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.