Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree?What other measures do you think might be effective?Provide reasons for your answer. Include relevant examples from your

Traffic and pollution problems have been become worst or dreadful both for human kind and environment, in present time. Hiking rates of petrol can curb these emerging problems of environmental pollution up to great extent. Nowdays for better convenience or to save time, people have their own personal vehicles, which is directly giving birth to more traffic congestion and health related issues both for flaura and fauna. I believe also, increasing the price of petrol could be prove a best way or remedy to solve growing traffic and hazardous problems.

Due to the increase rates of petrol people would prefer more to take public transports rather than personal vehicles. Firstly, it will directly lead to less traffic jam on roads and secondly, more use of public transportation will minimize the threat of global warming. Apart from it, green belts along the road sides or more trees and plantation can adversely help as a panacea in reducing pollution problems.

On a personal level in reducing pollution, i think government must have to make strict and mandatory rules or laws and should have to organise various campaigns and rallies to apprise people about eradication of such problems. With the help of such type of platforms, they could make people aware or agitate about the consequences and side effects of growing traffic and pollution. High prices of petrol would directly hit the minimum usage of private vehicles, which would lead to good environmental conditions, and that will directly pinnacle the economic growth and development of nation.

Somehow, hike in petrol prices will effect majorly to poor and middle class people, specially to those whose livelihood is mainly depends on Auto rickshaws. But for making big positive changes in the environment or to create balance, we can somehow sacrifice the contribution of these great people.

At last, i opine that by making strict regulations by government, like every single home of whole nation must have to plant at least one big foliage tree in their owned homes, could be a sign of big relieve in tackling such type of problems.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 486, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...sing the price of petrol could be prove a best way or remedy to solve growing tra...
^
Line 5, column 44, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...a personal level in reducing pollution, i think government must have to make stri...
^
Line 7, column 37, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
... Somehow, hike in petrol prices will effect majorly to poor and middle class people...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 10, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ion of these great people. At last, i opine that by making strict regulations...
^
Line 9, column 124, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... home of whole nation must have to plant at least one big foliage tree in their o...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, apart from, at least, i think

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 6.10837438424 262% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 23.0 8.36945812808 275% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 31.9359605911 166% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 5.75862068966 295% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1771.0 1207.87684729 147% => OK
No of words: 346.0 242.827586207 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11849710983 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 3.92707691288 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62792424418 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 139.433497537 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589595375723 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 379.143842365 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.6319046014 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.230769231 104.977214359 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6153846154 20.9669160288 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.30769230769 7.25397266985 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148998348569 0.242375264174 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058124424988 0.0925447433944 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559766764577 0.071462118173 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0753103951864 0.151781067708 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524637110539 0.0609392437508 86% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.1260098522 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.5310837438 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 55.0591133005 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.