Is individuals' personality affected by nurture and teaching, or genetics is more important? Give your opinion. Support your reasons with examples.
Recently, the phenomenon of individuals' personality is affected by nurture and teaching, or genetics is more important and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that individuals' personality is affected by nurture can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, affected by teaching can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, genetics is more important might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of teaching individuals' personality far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues’ potential implications.
- Governments and international organizations are facing global problems. Provide solutions. 88
- In a cashless society people use more credit cards What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon 80
- In social events, which one is better, being a good talker or a good listener? 88
- Company Top Level Authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to take any decisions? Discuss 88
- Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life. Discuss 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 415, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...ividuals. I am inclined to believe that individuals personality is affected by nurture can ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 252.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.82936507937 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32916169422 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650793650794 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9650270275 50.4703680194 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.545454545 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9090909091 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170839194524 0.242375264174 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0614799740735 0.0925447433944 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0852391760727 0.071462118173 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0947969785976 0.151781067708 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0767339966232 0.0609392437508 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 53.1260098522 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.83 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.93 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.