Many technological advancements revolutionizing the way of mass communication have been invented throughout the last decade, making the life of mankind on earth easy. The data revolution which changed the methods of mass communication had some negative and positive outcomes on the individual's life and society is a long-running dispute. In the following paragraphs, I will try to explain why it is both beneficial and drawbacks.
There are myriads of benefits to mass communication that had a positive impact on people. First and foremost it enables individuals to share and communicate their ideas with people all around the world. Teaching became easier after the invention of mass communication. Students were able to interact with teachers from different parts of the world getting every perspective of an idea. It also helped in bringing families together. People can chat and video call their relatives without even moving.
On the other hand, it is not wrong to say that it had also negative impacts on society. As the growth of mass communication increased the misconception of it also increased, particularly among youngsters. This resulted in their studies, hobbies, personalities, and so on. It is highly argued that this communication led to destroy the foundation of many families. It also affected the routines of people. People started getting lazy and instead of dealing with eye to eye conversation, they started to just schedule it in a mobile call.
In conclusion, The information revolution had many positive and negative aspects that changed people's lives, my personal statement is that the benefits of mass communication far outweigh its drawbacks.
- Space travel is fantastic these days but there are many issues such as environmental problems that we should be focusing on What are your views on the allocation of public funding 75
- Positive and negative effects of the information revolution through mass media 55
- The belching and unauthorized behavior is unacceptable in modern offices How far you support this view Give your response with justification 68
- Xenophobia has accelerated rapidly in the Western countries According to you what solutions can be proposed by the government and individuals 71
- People usually mix their private and professional life What are the pros and cons 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 283, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...e negative and positive outcomes on the individuals life and society is a long-running disp...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 315, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... on the individuals life and society is a long-running dispute. In the following paragraphs, I...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36882129278 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16919182702 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589353612167 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.3321536106 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.25 104.977214359 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4375 20.9669160288 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3125 7.25397266985 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2556171511 0.242375264174 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727222747303 0.0925447433944 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0989355527968 0.071462118173 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166274855378 0.151781067708 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0811933671689 0.0609392437508 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 12.6369458128 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 53.1260098522 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 55.0591133005 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.