The information revolution by modern mass media has both positive and negative consequences for individuals and for society. To what extent do you agree?
Nowadays, the information revolution led by modern mass media has become a prevalent topic for debate. Some people point out that they have positive consequences for both individuals and society, while others indicate that they are harmful. Personally speaking, I agree that the information revolution leading by urban mass media has both positive and negative effects on individuals and society.
On the one hand, the information revolution led by mass media can help individuals and society prevent the crisis. To illustrate, since there are numerous coverage and predictions about the natural disaster on TV and the internet, they will inform individuals and society to protect themselves and public property timely. For example, when I was living in Japan, a country with a high frequency of earthquakes, I found that every TV station was broadcasting earthquake predictions hourly. As a result, my friends and I can protect ourselves promptly at that time.
On the other hand, the information revolution brought by mass media could mislead the individuals and the society on prescription medications. In other words, since the drug industries spent numerous amounts of money on advertisements with a misleading tone and inaccurate information, consumers are more likely persuaded to purchase prescription medicines that they don’t need. For instance, a drug company promoted a kind of diet pills and claimed any consumer who took them would lose weight by 40 kg in a week. However, both my friend and I still kept the same weight and didn’t get rid of obesity after purchasing and using this drug.
To sum up, the information revolution generated by modern mass media has not only a positive impact on individuals and society such as the benefit of preventing the crisis but also negative influence such as the misleading on prescription medications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-27 | Janabakhshi | 85 | view |
- Some people point that experiential learning i e learning by doing it can work well in formal education However others think a traditional form of teaching is the best Do you think experiential learning is beneficial in high schools or colleges 78
- Do you think formal written assessments in today's world to assess students performance is effective or not? Discuss your viewpoint on this and support your answer with examples. 75
- It is argued that getting married before finishing school or getting a job is not a good choice To what extent do you agree or disagree 77
- Nowadays people believe that the environment influences their accomplishments Some people think their success and accomplishment were influenced by the places where they grew up Do you think the environment does or does not affect people s accomplishment 61
- Do you think formal written assessments in today's world to assess students performance is effective or not? Discuss your viewpoint on this and support your answer with examples. 75
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, still, while, for example, for instance, kind of, such as, as a result, in other words, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 8.36945812808 203% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 5.75862068966 295% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1573.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 296.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31418918919 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00946393463 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560810810811 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1763698726 50.4703680194 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.083333333 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6666666667 7.25397266985 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.404443517344 0.242375264174 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147490781148 0.0925447433944 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119845619357 0.071462118173 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252070443199 0.151781067708 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128642568891 0.0609392437508 211% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 12.6369458128 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.