International travel and tourism makes people prejudiced rather than broad minded. what are causes and what measures can be taken to solve this problem
The importance of international travel and tourism makes people prejudiced rather than broad-minded was always a debatable topic. Many people state that international tourism creates tension rather than understanding between people from different cultures. The following essay would further elaborate causes of this situation and suggest some ways forward.
To start with, the most important reason why some are opposed to international tourists is that tourists may unknowingly show disrespect for local culture. For instance, we generally cover our heads in a religious place. A tourist from other country may not follow our culture or take his shoes inside a temple. This may offend local people. Sometimes, youngsters may be attracted towards western culture which the tourist bring with them and many local people feel threat to their culture.
Moreover, the tourist dollar may not be helping local people. We all know visitors stay in five star hotels and enjoy the best facilities in the hotel. They may take two times shower in a day whereas the local people may not have enough water to drink. This case has been seen in Shim la which is a very popular tourist area in HimachalPradesh. On top of that, tourists buy local items from people at very low cost by bargaining a lot. The poor people, who look up for visitors end up with earning minimum amount. Finally, tourist end up with pollution, which helps nobody.
The solutions for this problem are not simple. We cannot discourage tourists and tourism as they are back bone of many economies of the world. First solution is that tour operators should take the onus of guiding tourists about the main things of local culture. Secondly, tourist should stay with locals as paying guest instead of staying in hotels. Local people will earn money and at the same time tourists will know the local culture.
To conclude, international travel and tourism do have a downside to it but many steps can be taken to lessen the negative steps.
- ageing people good/bad? 70
- Whether universities offer popular culture? 77
- Whether universities offer popular culture 89
- parents play imp role in educating children as teachers. Agree/disagree? 77
- In academic studies, grouping students according to academic abilities is good or not good? Give your opinion? 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, whereas, for instance, to start with, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 6.10837438424 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1673.0 1207.87684729 139% => OK
No of words: 332.0 242.827586207 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03915662651 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 3.92707691288 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56304417764 2.71678728327 94% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 139.433497537 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58734939759 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 7.0 1.56157635468 448% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 12.6551724138 166% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.5024630542 73% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.5279813093 50.4703680194 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.6666666667 104.977214359 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8095238095 20.9669160288 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.25397266985 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 2.75862068966 362% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176920758482 0.242375264174 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580171553872 0.0925447433944 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0834606160725 0.071462118173 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132993225269 0.151781067708 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116279091286 0.0609392437508 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 12.6369458128 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.1260098522 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.9458128079 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.5310837438 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.32886699507 95% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.3980295567 77% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.