The ancient languages are most likely dead languages in the contemporary era. There are heated arguments over the issue and Lion's share of society favor to implementing the old languages like Greek and French in school syllabus and rest of the society do averse of it. I strongly agree that there is no significant use of classical language in modern society. The following paragraphs would come up with reasons along with suitable examples before making a final note.
To commence with the first notion, there are various reasons supporting the disadvantages of ancient languages. First and foremost, studies are offering employment opportunities to the students, whereas professional company are potentially seeking knowledge, talent, soft skills and management of people rather than looking for employee’s language. Therefore, Universities from all over the world encourages comprehensive and intellectual knowledge irrespective of their languages.
Secondly, English is an international standard language in the world. Either working individuals or learning individuals are basically using the common language to communicate each other. Latin and Greek is old language that we can study in school days which encourage us to learn or listen literature. But this knowledge cannot give immense worth to anyone daily lives. For example, literature books help to entertain our leisure time not to make us to earn.
To recapitulate, I firmly agree the point classical language is not offering wealthy life to any individuals. Government should take the measures into account to implement languages in school curriculum that should be helpful to the students.
- Governments promise continuous economic growth, but it is actually an illusion. Some people think that governments should abandon this. please talk about validity and implications. 77
- Company’s top level authorities should get their Employees in decision-making 55
- Some people believe that exploring outer space is important because it expands human knowledge and might lead to discoveries that will benefit humanity in the future. Other people believe that space exploration is a waste of money that could be better spe 77
- Environment pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change can be made at the government level. What extent do you agree or disagree. 55
- Governments promise continuous economic growth but it is actually an illusion Some people think that governments should abandon this please talk about validity and implications 44
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 252.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61507936508 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05845821725 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662698412698 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7598545202 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.071428571 104.977214359 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.9669160288 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35714285714 7.25397266985 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253352149592 0.242375264174 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0778702972639 0.0925447433944 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748755960092 0.071462118173 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138727314258 0.151781067708 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0658537477943 0.0609392437508 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 12.6369458128 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 53.1260098522 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.02 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 55.0591133005 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.