Over the past few years, there has been a debate over this matter where people believe that some people are born with the creativity and specific talents and others are not. Whereas, there are some other people who claimed that creativity and specific talents can be taught. I believe that people born in the talented family always have an edge over the other children. This essay will further discuss both the points and then deduce a logical conclusion.
To begin with, People who are born in the talented family carry the same DNA, also they get the environment which helps their creativity and specific talent. For Example, it has been seen that children of the artist often choose to become the artist. This happens because these people get this environment from their childhood, which helps in the early development of their creativity. Thus it can be said that some people are really born with creativity.
On the other side, some people say that creativity can be taught, and a child can become a good sports person or musician. This appears true but without a favorable environment, teaching would become hard. For Example, it has been seen that people with more money and resources usually surpassed by the people who were born with the special talent but didn't have the same resources.
After analyzing the above facts, I would like to recapitulate that, people are born with the creativity and specific talent. Nevertheless, some talent can be taught but it is hard for them to surpass the people who are born with the talent.
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 55
- As E-books are available online these days, the value of printed books has diminished. Agree or disagree? 77
- people emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system rather new roads for vehicles that are overcrowding the cities. Do you agree or disagree? 72
- Could the economic growth be considered as a major parameter for success of the society? 77
- Some people believe laws change human behavior. Do you agree with it? 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 387, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... early development of their creativity. Thus it can be said that some people are rea...
^^^^
Line 5, column 353, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...o were born with the special talent but didnt have the same resources. After analy...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, nevertheless, really, so, then, thus, whereas, for example, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 5.94088669951 252% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1285.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88593155894 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3507079879 2.71678728327 87% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 139.433497537 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498098859316 0.580463131201 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 396.9 379.143842365 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4890249619 50.4703680194 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8461538462 104.977214359 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2307692308 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76923076923 7.25397266985 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289960629154 0.242375264174 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125560571831 0.0925447433944 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0986462852297 0.071462118173 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20348165465 0.151781067708 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657836298692 0.0609392437508 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 12.6369458128 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.1260098522 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.5310837438 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.03 8.32886699507 84% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 55.0591133005 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 58.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.