Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion about this? Discuss with appropriate examples.
Recently, the phenomenon of increasing of large shopping malls and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many the significance of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a susbstantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that reducing of small shops can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, different kind of shopping centers can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both improving social facilities and public place apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, congestion place might increase the consequences of public issues. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downsides of creative processes is correlated negatively with air pollution. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion fo increasing populations.
To conclude, while there are several compelling argument on both sides, I profoundly believe that the beneficial of community services far outwigh its drawback. Not only do the advantage of traffic congestion prove the significane of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues’ potential implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1365.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 237.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75949367089 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28220685496 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.700421940928 0.580463131201 121% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8601415716 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.090909091 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5454545455 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.18181818182 7.25397266985 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.089022399334 0.242375264174 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0296692599726 0.0925447433944 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456024583391 0.071462118173 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.04656297778 0.151781067708 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494268929928 0.0609392437508 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.07 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.