Law can change human behavior. Do you agree or not?
Nowadays, the influence of law on person’s behavior has become a long-running dispute among the public all over that world, which leads to moot question “whether a law can change human behavior or not?”. It is a widely held view that obtaining proper legislation is highly beneficial, whereas I tend to believe that one must weigh up carefully the pros and cons of this issue.
To begin with, it is a common belief that the phenomenon of law enforcement plays a vital role in the behavior of each society. Therefore, I express several reasons why I support this idea. First and foremost is that the crime rate and the motivation of committing the offense will be diminished. Secondly, the prevalence crimes, such as embezzlement, theft, corruption that cause damaging consequences decrease in the communities. In addition to this information, it should be mentioned that the majority of laws are efficient, including the traffic light and fastening seatbelt that guarantee the people’s lives. A very tangible example to illustrate would be Thailand that smuggling the drugs is excessively prevail, while the government could control it by tougher law to rehabilitate offenders.
However, undoubtedly law enforcement provides people with various negative points. It should be taken into account that the fear will be developed in the society due to the death penalty or prolonged captivations. Moreover, the criminals will be encouraged to revenge after prison and the violence and aggressive behavior might be raised. For instance, South Korea's nation has been deprived of their civil rights because of unreasonable laws.
To recapitulate, I entirely agree that imposing laws can restrict and change people’s behavior. However, as every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce stricter legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-01 | kamyar.diba | 55 | view |
| 2021-08-01 | kamyar.diba | 55 | view |
| 2021-07-31 | kamyar.diba | 55 | view |
| 2021-07-31 | kamyar.diba | 55 | view |
| 2019-11-05 | yasamin.gharib62 | 88 | view |
- Environmental pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change can be made at the government level. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 85
- Can the Internet replace the classroom teacher? Discuss your views. 96
- Do you think English will remain a global language despite globalization? Discuss your views with examples. 78
- Law can change human behavior. Do you agree or not? 77
- Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing, skydiving, bungee jumping or not? What are the reasons for that? 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...aw on person's behavior has become a long-running dispute among the public all over that ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 717, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'prevailed'.
Suggestion: prevailed
...that smuggling the drugs is excessively prevail, while the government could control it ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, while, for instance, in addition, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1630.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 297.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48821548822 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10491022833 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 139.433497537 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653198653199 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.292373368 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.428571429 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 7.25397266985 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 2.75862068966 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224682121639 0.242375264174 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0672100080501 0.0925447433944 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108960430857 0.071462118173 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136805117102 0.151781067708 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0735482100471 0.0609392437508 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.15 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.