Learn from personal experience works better than formal education.

Essay topics:

Learn from personal experience works better than formal education.

In these days, there has been a colossal upsurge in learning with experiments whether it is in a formal education or personal development. While books play an important role in ones learning, but it is also vital that learning from real-world practical experience is of paramount significance. The following paragraphs will explain why I am on the opinion of practical learning is a more effective way of teaching, and will lead to a plausible conclusion.

First and the foremost, there is a myriad of reasons in favor my argument. One of the most preponderant reason is that scenarios covered in the formal education are primarily based on generic situations, so a person will not be able to correlate with real-world while learning them. For example, a majority of the books only cover generic rules and problems, so it would be arduous for a person to imagine and correlate with a real situation while learning in a class. Hence, not only learning with practical acquaintance makes the class interactive, but also makes the learning effective

To embark this, another pivotal argument of this argument is that various topics like technology, manufacturing, and production in the education curriculum mainly focus on standard rules and describe how to follow them. For a student, these generic rules will only give basic knowledge, not the required practical experience. For example, according to recent research from Stanford University, it evident that teaching a class with own practical experience is more effective than explaining with what is mentioned in the books. Therefore, it is apparent that practical experience is a key for cogent learning.

Votes
Average: 5.5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-06-06 dumpalpr 55 view
2018-06-06 dumpalpr 55 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user dumpalpr :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
.... While books play an important role in ones learning, but it is also vital that lea...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, so, therefore, while, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1396.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 267.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22846441948 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99842617941 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539325842697 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 447.3 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.8861286034 50.4703680194 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.6 104.977214359 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7 20.9669160288 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.25397266985 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.12807881773 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198985060522 0.242375264174 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827547985287 0.0925447433944 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659820095165 0.071462118173 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142665916468 0.151781067708 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579593255843 0.0609392437508 95% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.1260098522 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.