Learning a new language at an early age is helpful for children. Is it more positive for their future aspect or have some adverse effects? Agree or disagree?
Recently the phenomenon of learning another language from childhood and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of learning language is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded highly thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that knowing a new language from early ages can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, learning foreign language by children can provide a society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that better job prosper as well as being more intelligent, are inextricably bound up. According to my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered children who start learning their second language in kindergarten are more genius and will have better career opportunities in the future. Thus, the beneficial consequences of being smarter and having more predictable opportunities in the future apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of education, the ability of speaking new language in adulthood might increase the consequences of not being a fast learner. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of learning a new language in adulthood related to this reality that the demerits of taking long time to learn pertain to laziness and being busy. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of learning a second language when they are grown up is correlated negatively with allocating enough time for learning. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of learning and other language in childhood.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of speaking a new language from childhood far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of being more intelligent prove the significance of learning a foreign language in early ages , but also pinpoint the reduction of laziness implication.
- In most of the education systems, students are assessed by written examinations. Do you think it is a good idea or not? Give your reasons. 80
- Do you think English will remain to be a global language despite globalization? 85
- Do you think English will remain to be a global language despite globalization? 88
- the violent portrayed on TV and in the movies leads to an increase in crime in our society. people who watch violent movies are more likely to become criminal. Do you agree or disagree? 77
- can change human behaviour. Do you agree or not? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 288, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to pertain'
Suggestion: to pertain
...e demerits of taking long time to learn pertain to laziness and being busy. As a tangib...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 236, Rule ID: PROVE_PROOF[2]
Message: Did you mean 'proof' (noun) instead of prove (verb)?
Suggestion: proof
...he advantages of being more intelligent prove the significance of learning a foreign ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 303, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...earning a foreign language in early ages , but also pinpoint the reduction of lazi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, second, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 31.9359605911 141% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1783.0 1207.87684729 148% => OK
No of words: 328.0 242.827586207 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43597560976 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10100713165 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 139.433497537 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567073170732 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 379.143842365 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.0572575164 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.583333333 104.977214359 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3333333333 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 7.25397266985 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292264099475 0.242375264174 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0965415751529 0.0925447433944 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0337706486023 0.071462118173 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158923968988 0.151781067708 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0280576254499 0.0609392437508 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 12.6369458128 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 53.1260098522 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.