Undoubtedly, in these days many people argue that life experience is better than books or formal education. While it is possible to believe that there are many people who manage large businesses and make millions of dollars a year with formal education. In this essay, I shall explain my point of view by analysing both positive and negative impacts of this argument followed by a rational conclusion.
At present, we hear are many success stories of people who had nothing for their parents or for themselves, but through formal education, they exceled and hold high chairs in many reputable organizations. With regards to a journal published by Harvard University it is revealed that people who are poor in their childhood have a higher tendency to success than who is a rich. For an example, when children take everything for granted, their level of commitment to success decreases tremendously compared to the opposite. Apart from that, books provide life experience and by developing extensive reading habits, people can succeed in their life. Others say that reading books and going to University will discipline someone.
Secondly, there are people who argue for life experience is better than books or formal education have a different view and say people should have more life experience than formal education to cope up with the society they live in. Then, there are others who believe formal education is waste of time as it kills nearly three years to become a graduate and in most cases, it costs more money too.
While there are strong argument to support both sides of the case; however, I disagree with the argument and strongly recommend for children to choose a carrier path which may help them in the future, not everyone is following.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, while, apart from, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 293.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0204778157 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59158334007 2.71678728327 95% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556313993174 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.7544650759 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.727272727 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6363636364 20.9669160288 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.54545454545 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31277898274 0.242375264174 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118526266261 0.0925447433944 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147452840324 0.071462118173 206% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183644152118 0.151781067708 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128903089008 0.0609392437508 212% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.1260098522 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.