These days, there is an ongoing debate among people about environment pollution and if it should be viewed as a positive or negative impact to the society. While it is possible to claim that environment pollution has adverse effects on every living species on Earth; however, my opinion is that the humans are responsible for pollution. In this essay, I shall explain my point of view by analysing drastic effects of human activities to wards environment.
There are several reasons why I believe humans are responsible for Earth’s contamination.
One of them is that technological advancements that happen around the world on every second. It can also be argued that toxic fumes that emits from vehicles and factories contributed more to environment pollution. For an example, if a development of a city requires deforestation, it will have an adverse effect on climate change. Ultimately, people will have to suffer its effects through Tsunamis and landslides.
Those who argue for not contributing to Earth’s destruction, have a different view and say human activities help Earth to its well-being. Firstly, it is claim that legislating environment law will tame people from harming their environment. Secondly, organizing awareness campaigns will also raise the awareness of people.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments to support both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of human activities contributes to Earth’s destruction.
I would strongly recommend that making aware of children at schools will contribute to preserve environment in the future.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 20.9802955665 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.75862068966 278% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1369.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 247.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54251012146 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16069117333 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 139.433497537 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599190283401 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.6157635468 195% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2954189141 50.4703680194 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.307692308 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61538461538 7.25397266985 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.12807881773 145% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 6.9802955665 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 2.75862068966 290% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200957729618 0.242375264174 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704659145027 0.0925447433944 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068493261906 0.071462118173 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115766189499 0.151781067708 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682150173415 0.0609392437508 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 53.1260098522 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.