Long distance communication is helpful for both doctors and the patients. Give your opinions about this statement.
Technology has positive and negative impact on our life style. Using technology, people can think to communicate with everyone either it is friend, family or doctor. These days, there is ongoing debate that long distance communication is helpful for both doctors and the patients. In this essay, I will provide my point of view by analyzing both sides of the argument.
In remote rural areas, hospital and good physician does not exist. It is beneficial for patients to take guidance from its physician by other mediums like phone or internet. For instance, there is plethora of websites on which all type of physician are available and appointment can be taken accordingly. These physicians can have video call and patient can feel the doctor is in front of him, which looks like natural environment and normal communication. Therefore, in the light of this success story we can say physician and patient could have long distance connection, though the technology resolves the issue of long distance.
On the other hand, people who think a patient and a doctor relationship is difficult to handle remotely have different views. Sometimes, it is difficult for the patients to describe the symptoms on cell phone; misunderstanding on both sides could be occurred. For example, a survey done in the early 21st century revealed that doctors who provide treatment over phone have less chances of diagnosis of actual disease. Hence, the repercussion of misunderstanding could have adverse effect on patient's life, which could deteriorate patient’s health.
To recapitulate remote communication between doctor and patients are helpful. The essay discussed main advantage of remote checkup, how it can be effective for patients and deleterious and detrimental effects of long distance communication with patients.
- Should the authorities from big cities around the world discourage citizens from using private cars and rather encourage them to use other means of transport such as bicycles, skates, the subway, etc.? 55
- Television has many useful functions to play in everyone's life, for some its relaxation, for some it iscompanion. Discuss your viewpoint and support your answer with examples and discussion point. 55
- Television has many useful functions to play in everyone's life, for some its relaxation, for some it iscompanion. Discuss your viewpoint and support your answer with examples and discussion point. 55
- Television has many useful functions to play in everyone's life, for some its relaxation, for some it iscompanion. Discuss your viewpoint and support your answer with examples and discussion point. 55
- Television has many useful functions to play in everyone's life, for some its relaxation, for some it iscompanion. Discuss your viewpoint and support your answer with examples and discussion point. 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 553, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'distanced'.
Suggestion: distanced
...y physician and patient could have long distance connection, though the technology resol...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 374, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun chances is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...s who provide treatment over phone have less chances of diagnosis of actual disease....
^^^^
Line 5, column 492, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'patients'' or 'patient's'?
Suggestion: patients'; patient's
...erstanding could have adverse effect on patients life, which could deteriorate patient&a...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, hence, if, look, so, therefore, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1536.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 285.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38947368421 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00794884143 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575438596491 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2548814587 50.4703680194 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.4 104.977214359 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 7.25397266985 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236619252999 0.242375264174 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0880703664639 0.0925447433944 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107940053139 0.071462118173 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169250784489 0.151781067708 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0949533751523 0.0609392437508 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 12.6369458128 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 55.0591133005 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.