Many companies involve employees in decision making policy. Some people think that it is important for the progression of company. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of implementing employees’ idea and its impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that their assistance in decisions is highly beneficial, this issue is regarded both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that using other workers can be a plus and I analyse it throughout this essay.
From social point of view, making decision on the basis of other people idea can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are stemmed from the fact that being assisted in important decisions and improvement are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was university student, I performed an experiment which discovered teamwork. Therefore. The beneficial ramifications of both taking advantages of various ideas and compony achievements can be seen.
Within the realm of economy, paying attention to diverse ideas might increase the consequences of being miss leaded. Moreover, fundamental aspects of what we decide relate to this reality that demerits of making decision alone pertain to financial problems. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of not being involved in any decision is negatively correlated with compony goals. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of compony organization.
To conclude, although there several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of taking decision using other people knowledge by far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of using different notion prove the significance of group decisions, but also pinpoint its implications.
- Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing??What are the reasons for that? 11
- extreme sports 36
- The claim that animals have right, has been the subject of much debate since 1970s. Are zoo helping or hurting our animals? should zoos be banned? Do you agree or disagree? 80
- extreme sports 88
- The claim that animals have right, has been the subject of much debate since 1970s. Are zoo helping or hurting our animals? should zoos be banned? Do you agree or disagree? 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 364, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...n experiment which discovered teamwork. Therefore. The beneficial ramifications of both t...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 264.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59848484848 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15914541047 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640151515152 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1601143859 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.166666667 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 7.25397266985 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129338421945 0.242375264174 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0376752557532 0.0925447433944 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410897483347 0.071462118173 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.070354294567 0.151781067708 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0152928251299 0.0609392437508 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 12.6369458128 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.47 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.