In many countries, children are engaged in different kinds of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it a valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibility. What is your opinion?
In recent decades, there has been considerable debate regarding children as workers in some countries. Some people are of the belief that this has a negative impact on the children, and some employers can abuse children while I firmly concur with the opinion that it is a good work experience and paramount learning of jobs and taking responsibility.
To begin with, the children can acquire work experience from their childhood which leads to further benefit to them. From my personal experience, a qualitative analysis was conducted by an eminent sociologist to explore further the effect of teaching career and preferable jobs. Final result revealed that there is a fairly clear relationship between children gain information faster even though employers abuse and low paid and further working hours should be taken into consideration.Thus, people are fully informed about sufficient evidence of a causal link between further advantages of working in childhood.
Furthermore, they learn taking responsibilities in lower ages. For instance, a quantitative research was carried out at the Melbourne university concerning the onus of the children and their behaviours and attitudes. Hence, perhaps if the scientific research is significantly correlated with accepting the rules, the preliminary findings will be closely related to both appropriate conducts in the workplace.
To recapitulate, according to the preceding discussion, I am inclined to the opinion that working in the early ages engender further benefit for children, and they practise to accept the responsibilities and acquire work experience. Moreover, not only should national institutions develop strategies, but also they should formulate them to educate the children as an employee.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 486, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Thus
...ours should be taken into consideration.Thus, people are fully informed about suffic...
^^^^
Line 3, column 25, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to take'.
Suggestion: to take
... in childhood. Furthermore, they learn taking responsibilities in lower ages. For ins...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, while, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 264.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65151515152 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21786043878 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628787878788 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.4493207392 50.4703680194 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.2 104.977214359 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4 20.9669160288 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.25397266985 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261516411144 0.242375264174 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0958560779698 0.0925447433944 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.084182775258 0.071462118173 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156799141153 0.151781067708 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0955521512171 0.0609392437508 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 12.6369458128 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 53.1260098522 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.37 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 55.0591133005 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.