There are social, medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones. What forms do they take? Do you agree that the problems outweigh the benefits of mobile phones?
In recent decades, there has been considerable debate regarding the increasing use of mobile phone. Mobile phones have a negative impact including technical, medical and social issues on the people. I firmly concur with the opinion that the disadvantages and problems of using mobile phones outweigh the cons and its benefits.
To begin with, mobile phones have a negative influence on the people's health and engender medical and social problems. From my personal experience, a qualitative analysis was conducted by an eminent sociologist to explore further heart disease and hurting the muscles. Final results revealed that there is a highly complex relationship between fewer communications with other and depression even though damaging the shoulders should be taken into consideration. Thus, people can be fully informed about sufficient evidence of a causal link between people's attitude and behaviour and employing the mobile phones.
Furthermore, technical problems of the mobile phones lead to economic costs, and they are prohibitively expensive. For instance, a quantitative research was carried out at the Melbourne University concerning the technician and devices and cases. Hence, perhaps if the scientific research is significantly correlated with the price of tools and its repairs, the preliminary findings will be closely related to both drawbacks of utilising the phones.
To recapitulate, according to the preceding discussion, I am inclined to the opinion that the cons of using mobile phones are more than its pros. It causes the human social and technical and medical problems. Moreover, not only should national institutions develop strategies, but also they should formulate them to encourage the humankind to employ other devices for communication.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 63, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...phones have a negative influence on the peoples health and engender medical and social ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 8.36945812808 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 267.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65543071161 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01558372095 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629213483146 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7097290979 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.153846154 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5384615385 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 6.9802955665 14% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303130894181 0.242375264174 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110074415166 0.0925447433944 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0899709803029 0.071462118173 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179973065792 0.151781067708 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0804863307741 0.0609392437508 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.66 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.