In many countries, the proportion of older people is steadily increasing. Does this trend have more positive or negative effects on the society?
Recently, the phenomenon of increasing the proportion of older people and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the old generation is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined that the study of the dramatic increase of elderly can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, an extensive range of old generation provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of life and job experience, as well as the incapability are inextricably bound up, according to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the rate of old people in many countries. Thus beneficial ramifications of both the retirement age and having the financial problems apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, raising the number of old generation might increase the consequences of the rate of life expectancy. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the lifespan could relate to this reality that the demerits of the Alzheimer disease pertain to losing the mental ability. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of losing physical ability is correlated negatively to the aging population. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the old age.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the drawbacks of increasing the proportion of old people far outweigh its benefits. Not only do the advantages of lack of performance prove the significance of job experience, but also pinpoint social implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 396, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...e rate of old people in many countries. Thus beneficial ramifications of both the re...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1550.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 288.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38194444444 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19069828651 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597222222222 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.4925950087 50.4703680194 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.909090909 104.977214359 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1818181818 20.9669160288 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149655437365 0.242375264174 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.043921699129 0.0925447433944 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380992255096 0.071462118173 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0791228638525 0.151781067708 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390526362855 0.0609392437508 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 53.1260098522 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.46 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.