Many people think regions affect successful persons What are your opinions about native regions and accomplished person influence on the regions they belong to

Essay topics:

Many people think regions affect successful persons. What are your opinions about native regions and accomplished person influence on the regions they belong to?

Nowadays, whether people think of regions affects successful person has numerous controversies and drawn the public's attention. Some people believe that religion is a must follow by every one, while others hold the view of that is waste of time and money. In my opinion, I believe it is waste of time for financial and cultural reasons.

Firstly, the financial reason is why I think religion is waste of money. Although potentially positive impacts of brain washing on people must taken into account, I still reckon that brain washing using religion has in many ways enormously harmed people's lives. For example, a well-known American scientist Einstein once said that religion is bio weapon for the world It is thus clearly shown that religion is waste of time.

Moreover, another factor that should be considered is the cultural reason. As far as society is concerned, the ultimate aim of delivering religion over humans is to coverup on some other persons work. For instance, a recent article published on Scientist American revealed that proof of religion marfia to the world. Undoubtedly, this is a clear indication that religion is waste of time and money.

To sum up, I hold that view that religion is waste of time and money. To address this issue, the government and society should make a concerned effort to find solution.

Votes
Average: 6.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'publics'' or 'public's'?
Suggestion: publics'; public's
...as numerous controversies and drawn the publics attention. Some people believe that rel...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 114, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Although potentially positive impacts of brain washing on people must taken into ...
^^
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[2]
Message: Did you mean 'have taken' or 'take'?
Suggestion: have taken; take
...mpacts of brain washing on people must taken into account, I still reckon that brain...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, moreover, so, still, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, i think, in my opinion, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1119.0 1207.87684729 93% => OK
No of words: 223.0 242.827586207 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01793721973 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6019249553 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 139.433497537 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551569506726 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 351.0 379.143842365 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6047773142 50.4703680194 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.25 104.977214359 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5833333333 20.9669160288 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.25397266985 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112410945821 0.242375264174 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0451419045308 0.0925447433944 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0895203463828 0.071462118173 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0709975250941 0.151781067708 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0802025663097 0.0609392437508 132% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 12.6369458128 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.5310837438 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 55.0591133005 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 58.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.