With the latest development of medical technology contributing to the increase life expectancy significantly, the implications would most likely be twofold. Research has shown that the human life expectancy could possibly be increased up to 100 years old. However, this gives rise to the controversy of whether it is a blessing or a curse to live long.
It would undoubtedly be a blessing to live long provided that the individual has all necessary resources to maintain a desirable living standard. Living standard could be considered from many aspects including both social and health status. It would be a blessing to be surrounded by the loved ones and be able to enjoy a relaxed retirement life if the circumstances allow. In fact, according to a recent survey by a well renowned university in Japan, there is a strong correlation between life expectancy and superior living standards.
In contrast, it would more likely be a curse to live long if the living standard is not maintained. For instance, an individual has a higher change of being prone to depression and isolation after the death of a spouse, and would prefer not to prolong their lives significantly. Similarly, a terminally sick person on life support may not be as motivated to live long if they are constantly on bedrest. Additionally, burdening their family with financial pressure for their life support is nonetheless a crucial psychological factor determining their living standards.
To summarise, whether it is a blessing or a curse to have long life expectancy would largely depend on the lifestyle and living standard associated with the prolonged life. With the help of the modern medical technology, everyone should plan ahead and prepare for the necessary expenditure for a longer retired life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 208, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
...as shown that the human life expectancy could possibly be increased up to 100 years old. Howev...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ctancy and superior living standards. In contrast, it would more likely be a c...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, nonetheless, similarly, so, well, for instance, in contrast, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 289.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18685121107 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06215666462 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 139.433497537 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539792387543 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 481.5 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.699879465 50.4703680194 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 115.307692308 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19940431129 0.242375264174 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805907233242 0.0925447433944 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639461502792 0.071462118173 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152994413944 0.151781067708 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100364791837 0.0609392437508 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 55.0591133005 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.