Recently, the phenomenon of this opinion that medical technology should be responsible for human's life expectancy and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the influences of medical technology is less expected, such an issue is regarded thoroughly constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the effects of this responsibility can be a minus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
To begin whit, there are various reasons to disagree with this viewpoint. At first, the advances in medical technologies have caused the more treatments and longer age for the patients. However, there are further reasons to life expectancy. For example, people's financial condition can affect the senses such as well-being.
In addition, the medical technologies made people confident that they can live more than before by the possibility of treatment for diseases. But, life expectancy is more phycological than technical, which highly depended on the social reasons and the people's situation in the society.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on this statement, I profoundly believe that despite all advantages with the advantages in medicine, its effects on the life expectancy is not far of our imagination.
- The claim that animals have rights has been the subject of much debate since the 1970s Are zoos helping or hurting our animals Should zoos be banned Do you agree or disagree 44
- The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education Einstein What does he mean by that And do you agree with his statement Support your point of view with reasons and examples from your own experience 79
- Some students work while studying. This often results in lacking time for education and constantly feeling under pressure. What do you think are the causes of this? What solutions can you suggest? 77
- Some people suggest that each family should only have a car and encourage alternative vehicle. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- the Information revolution has changed the way of mass communications and had some negative and positive effects on individual lives as well as on society. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently, the phenomenon of this opinion...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll analyze that throughout this essay. To begin whit, there are various reasons...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... affect the senses such as well-being. In addition, the medical technologies ma...
^^^^
Line 3, column 256, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
... depended on the social reasons and the peoples situation in the society. In concl...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the peoples situation in the society. In conclusion, while there are several c...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1129.0 1207.87684729 93% => OK
No of words: 205.0 242.827586207 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50731707317 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.92707691288 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11499224406 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 139.433497537 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60487804878 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 360.9 379.143842365 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3980544379 50.4703680194 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.9 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.25397266985 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22409290752 0.242375264174 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867933692501 0.0925447433944 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611670595689 0.071462118173 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121052495368 0.151781067708 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626647268614 0.0609392437508 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.32886699507 120% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.