more information available online so library books are useless. Do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

more information available online so library books are useless. Do you agree or disagree?

Recently, the phenomenon of replacing online information with library books and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that using internet information is highly beneficial, such issue regarded as thoroughly constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that leaving library books away can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
To begin with, there are various reasons to agree with this viewpoint. At first, many of library books are ancient and valuable. However, the knowledge of these books related to the past. Some of the scientific library books collected of past experiences and old. For example, the past knowledge of many sciences such as computer and medicine become useless after a period of time.
In addition, In the books, we can find reputed knowledge and reach to resources of the book. But, searching in a library to find a book is time-consuming. Today, we need to get information in lower time. For instance, a recent scientific research conducted by MNY University researchers in 2014 has shown that a significant number of experts and specialists in different arts search their necessary information on the internet because it is faster to search in a book.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on this statement, I profoundly believe that despite the importance of old library books, the benefits of online information are far outweighed their drawbacks.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-29 manraj123 70 view
2020-01-29 Alireza.r.68 85 view
2020-01-29 manraj123 55 view
2020-01-28 manraj123 80 view
2020-01-27 Alireza.r.68 88 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user mojtaba1980 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently, the phenomenon of replacing on...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll analyze that throughout this essay. To begin with, there are various reasons...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 193, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...dge of these books related to the past. Some of the scientific library books collected of p...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 243, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...e scientific library books collected of past experiences and old. For example, the past knowledg...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 371, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ter and medicine become useless after a period of time. In addition, In the books, we ca...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...become useless after a period of time. In addition, In the books, we can find r...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ause it is faster to search in a book. In conclusion, while there are several c...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1271.0 1207.87684729 105% => OK
No of words: 241.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27385892116 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04261724027 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576763485477 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 400.5 379.143842365 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.6093874074 50.4703680194 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7692307692 104.977214359 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5384615385 20.9669160288 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.69230769231 7.25397266985 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.33497536946 131% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235139257192 0.242375264174 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837623615668 0.0925447433944 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423212253364 0.071462118173 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134490758638 0.151781067708 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243598150484 0.0609392437508 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.