More information available online so library books are useless.” Agree or disagree with the statement?
Recently, the phenomenon of online information sources and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of seeking online materials is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that E-books can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, usage of library books can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of modern libraries, as well as university libraries, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered library books are not useless. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both equipped libraries and useful books apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, useless old books might increase the consequences of reading time deduction. Moreover, fundamental aspects of old-fashioned papers might relate to this reality that the demerits of finding a book pertain to online search. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of downloading PDF books is correlated negatively with a prescription. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of uneducated novelists.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of online libraries far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of well-educated writers prove the significance of referential materials, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 80
- The study needs time, peace and comfort, whereas employment needs the same thing. Someone says it is impossible to combine those two because one distracts one another. Do you think this is realistic in our lives today? To what extent do you agree with it? 11
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 85
- How widely do you think the problem spreads that people spend too much time on work than their personal life/family/leisure and experience time shortage? What problems will it cause? 85
- What roles should governments, companies, and individuals play to combat climate change? 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1459.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 257.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67704280156 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26184707232 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657587548638 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7138411083 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.583333333 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20435412649 0.242375264174 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641525132371 0.0925447433944 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0353227404435 0.071462118173 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105235329333 0.151781067708 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365524490645 0.0609392437508 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.82 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.