my template
Recently, the phenomenon of topic and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that N is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that N can be a pulse, and I will analyze it throughout this essay.
From the sociological standpoint, N can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that N, as well as N, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered N. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both N and N apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of psychological science, N might increase the consequence of N. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of N relate to this reality that the demerits of N pertain to N. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of N is correlated negatively with N. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of N.
To conclude, there are several compelling arguments on both sides. I profoundly believe that benefits of N far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only the advantages of N prove the significance of N, but also pinpoint N implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-01-07 | amin_mostafavi | 11 | view |
- Animals have "rights". Are zoos helping or hurting our animals? 77
- Many people think that regions affect a successful person. What is your opinion about native region and accomplished person’s influence on the region he belongs to? 11
- Animals have "rights". Are zoos helping or hurting our animals? 55
- stopping tobacco and related diseases by regulations 88
- Study a Particular Area of Climate Change: 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1114.0 1207.87684729 92% => OK
No of words: 220.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06363636364 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38837341215 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618181818182 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 353.7 379.143842365 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.3313981086 50.4703680194 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.6923076923 104.977214359 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9230769231 20.9669160288 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38461538462 7.25397266985 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0338485325795 0.242375264174 14% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00897233338031 0.0925447433944 10% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0310810745543 0.071462118173 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0164066283599 0.151781067708 11% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284171139003 0.0609392437508 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 12.6369458128 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.1260098522 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 11.5310837438 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.32886699507 120% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.