Nowadays, more and more people engage in dangerous activities, such as sky diving and motorcycling. Are you in favour of them? Use examples to support your opinion.
Recently, the phenomenon of participating in risky activities by many people and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of risk of injuries is highly serious, but getting rid of routine life is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that leaving the comfort zone can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
In my opinion, increasing humans' interest in doing perilous sports such as bungee jumping, cliff diving or motocross can provide a great sense of self-confidence and achievement. So, I strongly support these types of sports. According to my own experience, when I have done scuba diving, I practically discovered the rejuvenation of my mind. Furthermore, as a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that exciting sports such as wave surfing are correlated with a sense of humility. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of learning the concept of life by sport. Thus, beneficial ramifications of boosting calmness and focus during stressful situations apparently can be seen.
However, based on opponents' belief, being involved in adventure activities like rafting or rock climbing become a trend and it might increase the consequences of unnecessary danger. Moreover, in other aspects, being safe might be expensive could relate to this reality that raising the risk of brain injuries pertain to inefficient equipment.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of colossal engagement to extreme sports far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of enhancing fear management skills prove the significance of difficult activities as spiritual experiments, but also pinpoint increasing the physical and mental strength of individuals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-10 | Janabakhshi | 85 | view |
- As national services which one deserve to receive more financial support education or health 88
- Some people say music promotes children learning However there are mixed results on impact of music generated from researches To what extent do you agree or disagree that music has impacts on humans life 88
- What is your view on the idea that it takes failure to achieve success 88
- Because university degrees can get jobs with higher salaries university students should pay full cost for their education Do you agree or not 85
- Space travel is fantastic these days but there are many issues such as environmental problems that we should be focusing on What are your views on the allocation of public funding 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 19, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'opponents'' or 'opponent's'?
Suggestion: opponents'; opponent's
...arently can be seen. However, based on opponents belief, being involved in adventure act...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus, while, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 299.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54180602007 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18581842614 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 139.433497537 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665551839465 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8311873698 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.461538462 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 7.25397266985 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.080940645504 0.242375264174 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0247767885217 0.0925447433944 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.02700638411 0.071462118173 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0406653590699 0.151781067708 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0107527789679 0.0609392437508 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.74 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 55.0591133005 205% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.