As part of education, students should spend a period of time studying and living in a different country to learn language and culture. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of studying abroad and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although the matter of language and cultural barriers are contested by many, a substantial number of individuals think this issue is an opportunity to boost their life and educational quality. I am inclined to believe that acquaintance with new cultures can be a plus, and I will analyze both views throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, living in a new country for education can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of expanding skills, as well as experience new life, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student in a foreign country, I have learned many things from taking out my comfort zone and improving independence to encountering with the new culture. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both boosting social network and having friends from entire the world apparently can be seen.
On the other hand, opponents believe that studying in another country might increase the consequences of cultural shock. The reason pertains to face with a new language, culture, customs and foods, and encountering with these challenges can take time. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by Manchester University has asserted that language problems and acclimation with host culture are the main reasons for international students’ weaknesses. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of cultural challenges.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of staying in a foreign country to learn new things far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of raising self-esteem prove the significance of an independent lifestyle, but also pinpoint broaden the perspective on life implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 297.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44107744108 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11744876072 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 139.433497537 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3726133491 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.666666667 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146449162474 0.242375264174 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0500551300373 0.0925447433944 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0286138206013 0.071462118173 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0832761821469 0.151781067708 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.025422786479 0.0609392437508 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.