Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life.
Recently, the phenomenon of hard-working people and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the Local people is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and so positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that time management can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, having free time can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of working overtime, as well as life facilities, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment, which discovered clever people. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both spending the time and work-life balance apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, working conditions might increase the consequences of the life span. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of satisfied people could relate to this reality that the demerits of timetables pertain to full-time work. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of private life is correlated negatively with Lazy citizens. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of taking the time.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the personal life far outweigh its drawbacks. Do not only the advantages of the paid work prove the significance of personal activities, but also pinpoint wasting the time implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-05 | yasamin.gharib62 | 77 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | gupta-vikas | 55 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | richierich25 | 85 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | priyankavs23 | 77 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | priyankavs23 | 77 | view |
- Do you agree with getting married before finishing studies? 100
- Effect of internet and social media on young people communication and forming language 88
- Learning a newlanguage at anearly ageis helpfulfor children. Isit more positive for their future prospects or does it have some adverse effects as well? 11
- Whether the design of the buildings will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work? 77
- Whether the design of the buildings will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work? 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1410.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 258.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46511627907 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13692110548 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65503875969 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9410144802 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.5 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277209195361 0.242375264174 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0906793418089 0.0925447433944 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544278373637 0.071462118173 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150562485996 0.151781067708 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.020773897811 0.0609392437508 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.55 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.