Is tourism in less developed countries advantage or disadvantage? Discuss your views and give your opinion.
Recently, the phenomenon of whether tourism in less developed countries has an advantage or disadvantage? And its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that effects of the tourism industry on improving the social economy in developed countries is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the advantages of the tourism industry in developed countries can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the positive effects of tourism standpoint, this communicational industry can improve the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that living situations, improving the general economic conditions, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university researcher, I performed an academic investigation which discovered that increasing people income caused by the tourism industry. Thus, beneficial ramifications on both this pivotal 12th-century industry and accordingly the common welfare apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, the disadvantages of supporting tourism by the government in developed countries might increase the consequences of environmental pollution. As a tangible example, some environmentalists undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of environmental pollution is correlated negatively with increasing number of visiting people. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the tourism far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1650.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 280.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.89285714286 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.43762940387 2.71678728327 127% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603571428571 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 379.143842365 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.3001357377 50.4703680194 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.5 104.977214359 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.25397266985 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180557386657 0.242375264174 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735154508808 0.0925447433944 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0987872593167 0.071462118173 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105956957663 0.151781067708 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0869216349918 0.0609392437508 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 12.6369458128 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 53.1260098522 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.18 11.5310837438 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.59 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.