Nowadays TV has become an essential part of life. Medium to spread news & awareness and for some it acts like a companion. What is your opinion about this?
Recently, the influence of TV has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “does it acts as a companion?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that TV has become an essential part of life, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the educational standpoint, television programs are bound up inextricably with spreading news and awareness, which indicates they lead to both TV addiction and t-commerces. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between environmental factors and a hectic lifestyle as well as an exponential increase in intellectual values. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of fundamental impacts is correlated positively with not only changing public attitude but also regulatory policy reform.
Within the realm of the contemporary era, without the slightest doubt, attribute to the function of television, in that it would come down to gathering the family together, sitcoms, and serials. A salient example of such attribution is a new agenda, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take a feasible solution for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint current system problems. Besides, this criterion is an indispensable part of modern lifestyle. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of surveillance.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that medium like TV has become an essential part of life. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: DOES_NP_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'act'?
Suggestion: act
...tably leads to a moot question “does it acts as a companion?”. Whereas it is a widel...
^^^^
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'act'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: act
...tably leads to a moot question “does it acts as a companion?”. Whereas it is a widel...
^^^^
Line 5, column 71, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...porary era, without the slightest doubt, attribute to the function of television,...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 287.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49825783972 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22069604311 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 139.433497537 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.679442508711 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.343301487 50.4703680194 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.384615385 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0769230769 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259736846515 0.242375264174 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0710775890721 0.0925447433944 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0908464472842 0.071462118173 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145971760054 0.151781067708 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0854010664566 0.0609392437508 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.83 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 55.0591133005 202% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.