One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing, is this a curse or blessing?
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in the development of better medical technologies. However, there is a widespread worry that augmented rise of medical technology will be a curse as it is directly proportional to an increase in life expectancy. This essay will discuss why in my opinion, this apprehension is warranted and needs serious consideration as life expectancy increase due to better medical technology is a curse to mankind.
There is a myriad of arguments in favor of my stance. The most preponderant one is that increase in life expectancy brings additional burden to the existing population. Needless to say, that population increase not only causes a wide range of problems just to the human population, but it also causes trouble to the non-human animal population. For example, a 20% increase in life expectancy rate in China has caused a 40% reduction in per capita income to its existing population. Thus, increase in the population due to enhanced life expectancy is a major drawback.
Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that modern medical technology responsible for life expectancy has also caused extended damage to the natural environment. Unlike in the past, evolving medical technology is increasingly consuming components that are not eco-friendly. These eco-friendly materials like plastic, for instance, is tremendously harmful to the environment. Above reasons are enough to support my notion that there is huge damage to the environment caused by medical technology to improve life expectancy.
From what has been discussed, one can conclude that an increase in Life expectancy due to better medical technology is a curse as it causing an increase in population and damage to the environment. In my opinion, although life expectancy is indeed increasing it is definitely a curse rather than a blessing.
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing, is this a curse or blessing? 61
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing, is this a curse or blessing? 61
- Do you think the significance of English language as an international language will be lost with globalisation or its significance will increase with globalisation? What is your opinion? 65
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing, is this a curse or blessing? 61
- one of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing, is this a curse or blessing? 65
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, thus, for example, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.5418719212 180% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.75862068966 278% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1596.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19190643138 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483333333333 0.580463131201 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 535.5 379.143842365 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8025740117 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 7.25397266985 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235107550391 0.242375264174 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0925094453996 0.0925447433944 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606416229172 0.071462118173 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161473726195 0.151781067708 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441315858757 0.0609392437508 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 12.6369458128 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 55.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.