The ownership of cars should be restricted to one per family in order to reduce the traffic congestion and pollution. to what extent do you agree or disagree.
The importance of ownership of cars should be restricted to one person family in order to reduce the traffic congestion and pollution which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while other reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate my views for favoring the positive impact of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that traffic is increasing day by day it cause many problems in people’s life. Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that some people think that the government should be restricted that one car per family and this problem might be solved. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
Elaborating my viewpoint, there are some more merits but one of the crucial effects is that the ownership of cars should be restricted to one person per family in order to reduce the traffic congestion and pollution. Besides, government should take some decision to solve the pollution problem which is faced by people in their daily life. For example, many people face problem due to pollution like, asthma and there are also many problem which is faced by people. Hence, it is apparent why many are against of this trend.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of traffic congestion and pollution are indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 163, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'causes'?
Suggestion: causes
...hat traffic is increasing day by day it cause many problems in people's life. An...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 428, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun problem seems to be countable; consider using: 'many problems'.
Suggestion: many problems
...llution like, asthma and there are also many problem which is faced by people. Hence, it is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 433, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'problems'?
Suggestion: problems
...on like, asthma and there are also many problem which is faced by people. Hence, it is...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, if, so, thus, while, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.5418719212 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 284.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02816901408 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64704436687 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503521126761 0.580463131201 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 448.2 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.3937540104 50.4703680194 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.25397266985 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271883930312 0.242375264174 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101884529099 0.0925447433944 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147670971944 0.071462118173 207% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168382172971 0.151781067708 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05029282753 0.0609392437508 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.5310837438 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 55.0591133005 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.