Parents should be held legally responsible for children’s act. What is your opinion?
Being a parent comes to a great sense of responsibilities towards the child. It is duty of every parents to discipline their children. Parents are their first mentor, role model or teacher so in my view, parents should be held legally responsible for children’s acts and parents are entitled to monitor and educate their children on what is right and wrong, individually and socially. This essay will discuss in detail that parents are responsible for children’s acts.
To commence with, Parents should be aware of their children acts or actions. It is quite often that children can cause harm to someone whether intentionally or unintentionally. In that case, it should be parents’ responsibility towards to the other person. Even if the harm is accidental, consequence can vary from minor to serious. Sometimes parents are also liable to pay hefty amount for their child’s act. For example, my brother accidentally injured a classmate so my parents compensated the family with his medical bills. So, parents should be legally bound for kids’ actions.
To continue with, it is said that Children are like sponge they absorb and imitate whatever they observe. For instance, in a developing age, a child learns language, culture and manners by observing their parents. So, if parents speak abusively manner and respect their elders and love their younger, then it is most likely to observed by child and imitate their words. Therefore, parents are responsible for their kid’s language.
In conclusion, the forgoing discussion propounds the view that parents should teach their children about moral values and kindness, even they should watch their own words and actions towards other front of children. I think, parents are solely responsible for children’s actions.
- A recent study has shown that over 50% of school children cannot write legibly. The researchers concluded that the widespread use of smartphones, tablets and computers by children from as young as 12 months old was to blame. We are now living in a “post 77
- Should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport 90
- It is important to preserve the beautiful buildings of the past, even if it will be expensive to do so. To what extent do you agree or disagree with it. 80
- Some organizations integrate employees in decision making process of their goods and services. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this. 80
- Nowadays, the mass media including TV, radio and newspaper have become the essential part of our lives. What is your opinion? 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.5418719212 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 20.9802955665 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1529.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 283.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40282685512 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99272634779 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558303886926 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6551724138 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.2811956805 50.4703680194 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.9411764706 104.977214359 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6470588235 20.9669160288 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.82352941176 7.25397266985 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.465000703207 0.242375264174 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.184412873398 0.0925447433944 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134163081595 0.071462118173 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.319834388053 0.151781067708 211% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142651479868 0.0609392437508 234% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 12.6369458128 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.1260098522 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 55.0591133005 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.