Parents should be held legally responsible for children’s acts. What is your opinion?
In this day and age, the statement that, parents should be held responsible for children's acts, which was always debatable has now become controversial. It could be strongly agreed upon the fact that parents are responsible for their wards has some favourable arguments in support of it, however there has always been some contention about it. This article will discuss both sides of the critique before a plausible conclusion is found.
In the onset, it is firmly believed that kids are mirrors of parents. The right to correct a child lies on the parents shoulders. As a result, child continues his misbehaviour as long as his parents does not correct him. This could be illustrated by the story of a mother and his son who had been sentenced to death for robbery. The convict claimed that if his mother had warned him, he would not have been convicted then. Henceforth it is quite conspicuous that parents are onus for childs behaviour.
On contrary, some people believe that folks are not to be blamed. They cement this fact by providing a plethora of evidences. For instance, since the child spent a significant amount of time in school and with his fellow mates, not only his parents, his teacher and friends can also contribute to his behaviour.
By diligently analysing the above view points, the responsibility of parents overweight those of his teachers or peers. Therefore I am strongly inclined to believe that folks are responsible for their ward's acts.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 355, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...th for robbery. The convict claimed that if his mother had warned him, he would n...
^^
Line 5, column 426, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Henceforth,
... he would not have been convicted then. Henceforth it is quite conspicuous that parents ar...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 121, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...rweight those of his teachers or peers. Therefore I am strongly inclined to believe that ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, then, therefore, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 20.9802955665 157% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1234.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 248.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97580645161 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70429573099 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600806451613 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 379.143842365 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.8749961925 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.1428571429 104.977214359 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7142857143 20.9669160288 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.25397266985 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22449349668 0.242375264174 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757862024539 0.0925447433944 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0859849706775 0.071462118173 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140172576114 0.151781067708 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0819108819814 0.0609392437508 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 12.6369458128 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.1260098522 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.9458128079 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.5310837438 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 55.0591133005 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.