Parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s acts. What is your opinion? Support it with personal examples.
Recently, parents' responsibility for their children has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question: Should parents be legally held responsible for their children's behaviour? It is a widely held view that parents should not be forced legally to accept the responsibility of their children's behaviour, but this essay will discuss why it is both positive and constructive.
To begin with, the absence of parents' legal responsibility for children's behaviour is bound up with neglecting parental supervision, which indicates they lead to children's unlawful and anti-social behaviours. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between parental liability and juvenile crime rate as well as adolescents' street crimes. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of children's misbehaviour is correlated positively with inadequate parental legal responsibility.
As far as parenting is concerned, no legal penalty against children's wrongdoings seems to contribute to poor upbringing. This, in turn, would come down to improperly shaping children's character and giving rise to children's aggressive behaviour. A salient example of such attribution is minor crimes committed by young children, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take parental responsibility for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, sociologists might have had the opportunity to pinpoint inevitable behavioural problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of legal responsibility.
To conclude, parental liability for children's behaviours is a pragmatic solution to increase the proportion of children who will turn to law-abiding and sensible members of society in the future.
- In most of the education systems, students are assessed by written examinations. Do you think it is a good idea or not? Give your reasons. 85
- Parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s acts. What is your opinion? Support it with personal examples. 77
- Parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s acts. What is your opinion? Support it with personal examples. 77
- In most of the education systems, students are assessed by written examinations. Do you think it is a good idea or not? Give your reasons. 85
- In most of the education systems, students are assessed by written examinations. Do you think it is a good idea or not? Give your reasons. 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1597.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 268.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.95895522388 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38749050055 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634328358209 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.87585793 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.181818182 104.977214359 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3636363636 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45454545455 7.25397266985 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373458545353 0.242375264174 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142888842539 0.0925447433944 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113895121284 0.071462118173 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230232339499 0.151781067708 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112540155734 0.0609392437508 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 12.6369458128 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.58 11.5310837438 152% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.54 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.