The development of society is marching towards a globalized world where parents should be held legally responsible for children’s act. It is undeniable that lot of potential advantages stem from the parents responsibility on children actions. I strongly agree that parent responsibility towards children activities can help children and society reap enormous benefits. In this essay, I shall explain my point of view by analyzing the argument in various perspectives.
To begin with, a multitude of reasons can be offered to explain why parents should be legal liable for children acts must be favored. Foremost among them is that children are like a sponge; they absorb and imitate everything they absorb. Therefore parents duty to exercise reasonable care, supervision, protection and control over minor children. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered that kid is a mirror image of his or parents. Consequently, these implications prove healthier for better prospective.
To continue further, the positive aspects of parents’ duty to teach good ethics to their children manifest themselves in providing social behavior, culture, discipline, language and manners. To substitute this, if parents speak in an abusive way, it is most likely that child will observe and imitate in the same way.
In conclusion, I concede that parents’ duty towards children acts plays an integral part in the overall development of kid and future. I would strongly recommend that parents should be held responsible for children’s act.
One of the most conspicuous
One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is parents are held responsible for their children act. As, such, there are both merits and demerits to this trend, although I am of the opinion that latter outdo the former.
There are a deluge of arguments in favor of my stance. The most preponderant is that children are like sponge they absorb and imitate what they adsorb from their parents. Parents play a vital role in correcting their children and teaching them a good ethics. Needless to say, all these have a far reaching potential impact on society, individual lives.
There are , however, some pitfalls that can easily overwhelm the potential benefits of something. Primarily, children's do adsorb many things from outside their family example from their friends, school etc. So it is not only parent's are responsible for their behavior but the social institutions plays an equal role in building healthy citizen.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that despite some despite some drawbacks, the parents are indeed too dire to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 205, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'parents'' or 'parent's'?
Suggestion: parents'; parent's
...t of potential advantages stem from the parents responsibility on children actions. I s...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 238, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...orb and imitate everything they absorb. Therefore parents duty to exercise reasonable car...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 233, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an abusive way" with adverb for "abusive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...s. To substitute this, if parents speak in an abusive way, it is most likely that child will obse...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, so, therefore, in conclusion, to begin with, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1372.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 247.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55465587045 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18881365269 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 139.433497537 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631578947368 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.6157635468 195% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9601767498 50.4703680194 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.538461538 104.977214359 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.25397266985 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349411923927 0.242375264174 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12813869807 0.0925447433944 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123426060551 0.071462118173 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216331526554 0.151781067708 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0739460986597 0.0609392437508 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.