Personal development is the base for professional development and advancing in one’s career. agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of personal development as a base for professional development and advancing in one’s career and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of personal characteristics is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am tremendously inclined to believe that the self-motivation can be a plus, and I will analyse that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, personal disciplines can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of respect to others, as well as the enhanced knowledge, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the practical skills and motivational speech. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both the positive outlook and the healthy lifestyle apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, personal attitude might increase the consequences of leading society in the wrong way. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of the wrong attitude could relate to this reality that the demerits of dangerous attitude pertain to kill someone’s life. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious college has asserted that the downside of the horrible communication is correlated negatively with the performance ratings. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the professional career.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of personal development in professional growth far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of problem-solving capabilities prove the significance of satisfactory personal life, but also pinpoint social implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-06 | dhavalpatel095 | 77 | view |
- sports, plating in a team or individual? what are the reviews and possible solutions for that? discuss. 88
- In a war of ideas, it is people who get killed”. Does a common man suffer from a group’s ideology? Express your opinion. 77
- Global problems related to governments and international organizations, what are the problems and what is your opinion? 85
- Does a certain type of music effect on a human? Agree / Disagree. 88
- In underdeveloped countries, tourism has disadvantages and can be said the opposite as well. Discuss your opinions and give examples. 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, look, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 1207.87684729 136% => OK
No of words: 282.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80496453901 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.45029629742 2.71678728327 127% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631205673759 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3066950452 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.416666667 104.977214359 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91666666667 7.25397266985 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25945355062 0.242375264174 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837001315021 0.0925447433944 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153326851517 0.071462118173 215% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142017292237 0.151781067708 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121107257652 0.0609392437508 199% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 12.6369458128 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 53.1260098522 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.66 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.6 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.