Polygamy has led to massive divorce rate around the globe. Give possible solutions for various situations to reduce the issues.
Recently, the phenomenon of polygamy has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “what steps can be taken to tackle this issue?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that it has led to massive divorce rate around the globe, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, polygamy is bound up inextricably with having multiple spouses, which indicates they lead to both dysfunctional families and troubled children. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between environmental factors and a hectic lifestyle as well as an exponential increase in fundamental issues. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of long-term influences is correlated positively with not only changing public attitude but also social policy reform.
Within the realm of society and culture, without the slightest doubt, being polygamous attribute to disrupted attitudes, in that it would come down to truancy, being antisocial, and asocial. A salient example of such attribution is a hidden agenda, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take a feasible solution for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint current inefficient system problems. Besides, this criterion is an indispensable part of modern lifestyle. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of education and surveillance.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that various measures must be implemented to tackle this issue. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1631.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 291.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60481099656 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11730257933 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 139.433497537 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.701030927835 0.580463131201 121% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6597861004 50.4703680194 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.461538462 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3846153846 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13592446244 0.242375264174 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0366750300209 0.0925447433944 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645593564284 0.071462118173 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0774668316556 0.151781067708 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0750777222293 0.0609392437508 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.08 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 55.0591133005 212% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.