Poverty is a major issue worldwide. Many charities exist to help collect monetary donations. Who should decide what the donations are spent on? The people in need or the charitable organisations?Support your point of view from your own experience, observations or reading
The role of charitable organizations in spending the donations is widely debated, with many people claiming that they should not decide where the donations are spent on. However, in my view, the impoverished people should have the ultimate say in this decision. This essay will further elaborate on both sides and thus, will lead to a logical conclusion.
To begin with, there are various reasons why authorities and charitable organizations should not be involved in decision-making where money is concerned. The most conspicuous one is that they often misuse the people’s fund by channelling them into less important activities or most of the times fill their pockets. Moreover, the purpose of the donations deviates and it is the poor people who ultimately suffer. Thus, these corrupt organizations undoubtedly do not value the donations.
On contrary, another perspective that the poor people should decide how and where to spend the money has a potential influence. These needy people are the real sufferers of the hardships and understand the value of money. Furthermore, they are the better ones who can decide where they want to spend the money. Hence, the chances of misusing the funds by these people in need are very less and therefore, will use them more appropriately and wisely.
In view of the arguments outlined above, the charitable organizations are not the better authority to take the decision concerning the donations, but the poor people should themselves decide where they want to use the money as they are the ones who understand the real value of money and will make a wise decision.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-04-08 | meenutalwar | 75 | view |
| 2018-04-08 | meenutalwar | 75 | view |
| 2018-04-07 | TravelM | 85 | view |
| 2018-04-07 | TravelM | 55 | view |
| 2018-04-04 | manish123 | 80 | view |
- Do you think playing no smoking cautionary videos in the film are relevant 63
- Should governments build more road to allow more vehicle owner or improve the public transport? 77
- Any recent invention that you think has proved detrimental or beneficial to society? 80
- Parents should be held legally responsible for the children’s acts. What is your opinion? Support it with examples 72
- What are the pros and cons of this era as it is full of inventions? 44
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, however, moreover, so, therefore, thus, in my view, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.75862068966 17% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1355.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 264.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13257575758 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87375706753 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515151515152 0.580463131201 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 432.0 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.9684113928 50.4703680194 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.916666667 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164457297737 0.242375264174 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0673127172207 0.0925447433944 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506697955401 0.071462118173 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114431677769 0.151781067708 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286229184228 0.0609392437508 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.