Professional workers like doctors, nurses and
teachers make a greater contribution to society
and so should be paid more than sports and
entertainment personalities. To what extent do
you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of Professional workers like doctors, nurses and teachers make a greater contribution to society
and so should be paid more than sports and entertainment personalities and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that professional workers make a greater contribution to society can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, professional workers should be paid more than sports and entertainment personalities can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, making a greater contribution to society with professional workers might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of should be paid more than sports and entertainment personalities far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues’ potential implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-25 | Mohammad1364 | 88 | view |
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do you support or not? 77
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do you support or not? 88
- Some say that music is as important as other subjects in schools to promote learning in children life.do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion. 54
- Law can change human behavior. Do you agree or not? 79
- Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 179, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n sports and entertainment personalities far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 284.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.86267605634 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40337439177 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605633802817 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 379.143842365 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.959831964 50.4703680194 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.363636364 104.977214359 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8181818182 20.9669160288 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285136271994 0.242375264174 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0990843418108 0.0925447433944 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123608124342 0.071462118173 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173836759923 0.151781067708 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.086895524183 0.0609392437508 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 12.6369458128 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.72 53.1260098522 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.54236453202 223% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.9458128079 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.0 11.5310837438 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.55 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.