The rate of accidents is increasing a lot. Some suggest that repeat driving test annually is the best answer to deal with this situation. Do you agree or disagree?
Undoubtedly, the rate of accidents increasing alarmingly, considering this there are some analyst who insists that the driving test should be renewed annually. In order to reduce the road trauma. I firmly agree with the above-recommended proposal argument due to a notable reason.
There is a practical factor that affirms, the benefit of imposing the policy of repeat driving test every year. The driver will be able to improve their driving skill because the poor driving skills are the main reason in accidents. For instance, a recent survey conducted by Vehicle registry body found that refreshing driving skill needs to be implemented.
In spite of the factor discussed above regarding the benefit of repeat driving test annually. There are some group who consider this test as a negative factor. Paying the extra money and spending time could be a prime reason behind opponent’s viewpoint. No doubt there is time and wastage of money could be there; however, it should not be forgotten that the rate of accidents and deaths on our road cannot be compared.
In the end, Indeed legislation of the policy repeat driving test every year could be justified. But I still believe that in order to combat the issue of accidents, there is a need to follow this suggestion.
- Do you think English will remain to be a global language despite globalisation? 56
- Age discrimination occurs when a decision is made on the basis of a person s age In the workplace these are most often decisions about being employed in the first place winning promotions or being unfairly dismissed Should discrimination against older wor 100
- Advantages & Disadvantages of Cashless Society. 55
- Benefits of marketing in today s world 80
- Company top level authorities should or should not take employee suggestions or ideas to take any decisions. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'analysts'?
Suggestion: analysts
...mingly, considering this there are some analyst who insists that the driving test shoul...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 110, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'groups'?
Suggestion: groups
...t driving test annually. There are some group who consider this test as a negative fa...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, regarding, so, still, for instance, no doubt, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1074.0 1207.87684729 89% => OK
No of words: 212.0 242.827586207 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06603773585 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74721127897 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 139.433497537 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570754716981 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 336.6 379.143842365 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.684290392 50.4703680194 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5 104.977214359 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 20.9669160288 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.25397266985 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 6.9802955665 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209663101639 0.242375264174 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804749299564 0.0925447433944 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648705492146 0.071462118173 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137304753228 0.151781067708 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508105312011 0.0609392437508 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 12.6369458128 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 11.5310837438 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.32886699507 98% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 55.0591133005 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 63.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.