The right amount of motivation and practice can teach one better than the training given to him in classrooms by teachers. Do you agree or disagree?
The importance of motivation and practice is better than classroom training by teachers, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The
substantial influences of motivation and practice and training given in the classroom by teachers has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on students in recent years. It can be said that right motivation and practice has better prospects for students, however, some people concern that classroom training by teachers is beneficial. This essay will elaborate how motivation and practice can have positive impact than classroom training by teachers and why in some cases it is not conducive and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why correct motivation and practice are a plus for students compared to classroom training by teachers, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that students grasp more when they are encouraged and set free. Example for instance, according to Institution of neuroscience children learn 75 percent faster than usual, if they are encouraged and given proper exercise. Additionally, Inspiring students can help them built their self-confidence, which is an essential element for success. Right amount of motivation and practice for this reason, can play a vital role to achieve success than classroom training by teachers.
Nevertheless, some people adopt an opposing view and tend to believe that ample time given towards motivation and practice is not better than classroom training by teachers, as there are innumerable reasons for that, but the most prominent one lies in the fact that, every students have different coping mechanism when studying. Example as an illustration, according to scientific research introvert students performs better when they self-study. Motivation and practice Therefore is not conducive than classroom training by teachers.
From what had been discussed above, it can be conclude that, motivation and practice is prominent, but classroom training by teachers should not be overlooked.
- The government should invest more money in science education rather than other subjects to develop the country To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 57
- People usually mix their private and professional life What are the pros and cons 69
- The right amount of motivation and practice can teach one better than the training given to him in classrooms by teachers. Do you agree or disagree? 80
- Xenophobia has accelerated rapidly in the western countries. According to you what solutions can be proposed by government and individuals? 80
- Companies top level authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to take any decisions. Discuss. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 367, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dren learn 75 percent faster than usual, if they are encouraged and given proper ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 8.36945812808 215% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.75862068966 278% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1777.0 1207.87684729 147% => OK
No of words: 320.0 242.827586207 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.553125 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95167954043 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49375 0.580463131201 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 528.3 379.143842365 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.7169849151 50.4703680194 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.083333333 104.977214359 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6666666667 20.9669160288 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.398379999207 0.242375264174 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.179853073647 0.0925447433944 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103991316192 0.071462118173 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242299278317 0.151781067708 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474182672319 0.0609392437508 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 12.6369458128 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.1260098522 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.