Right amount of motivation and practice can train better than classroom training. What is your opinion? Provide relevant examples.
Recently, the phenomenon of having adequate motivation or practice and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of attending in the classroom is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that having rational motivation for training can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, strong motivation can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of frequent practice, as well as devoted effort, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the influence of having strong incentive on cognitive skills and theoretical knowledge. Thus, beneficial ramification of both abundant talent and the best endeavors apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, overwhelming desire might increase the consequence of major success. Moreover, fundamental aspects of having educational eagerness would relate to this reality that the demerits of lack of motivation pertain to lack of definite plan. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of studying vigorously without training in the classroom is correlated negatively with failing in the exam. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of having the source of inspiration.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of adequate motivation and constant practice for training outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of mental simulation prove the significance of performing well in the exam, but also pinpoint practical implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1625.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 287.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66202090592 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17331517832 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634146341463 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6240877182 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.416666667 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9166666667 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147858375508 0.242375264174 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0463327975936 0.0925447433944 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0360490214545 0.071462118173 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0840380042822 0.151781067708 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0262767274685 0.0609392437508 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.83 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 55.0591133005 200% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.