Senior executives should get their employees involved in the decision making process. What is your opinion in this?
Recently, the phenomenon of decision-making processes and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although challenged by many that the matter of executive expertise is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that being a top employee can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social point of view, getting involved in making decisions can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of executive cultures, as well as managing employees, are inevitably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the relationship between executive managers and diligent employees. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both employers policies and being decisive apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, senior executives responsibilities might increase the consequences of making the right decision. Moreover, fundamental aspects of executing wrong decisions could relate to this reality that the demerits of losing interests pertain to an isolated employee. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of a team-oriented employer structure is correlated negatively with well-paid employees. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of seeking the right decisions.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of employees' responsibilities far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of executive cultures prove the significance of decision making discussions, but also pinpoint a team player employee implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1597.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 274.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.82846715328 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36003764101 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664233576642 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6291664764 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.083333333 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238932472153 0.242375264174 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746567718394 0.0925447433944 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568317079653 0.071462118173 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129617401981 0.151781067708 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00818914918924 0.0609392437508 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.83 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.01 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.