Should the authorities from big cities around the world discourage citizens from using private cars and rather encourage them to use other means of transport such as bicycles, skates, the subway, etc.?
Transportation is the necessity of modern day life. People use cars, motorcycles etc. to move around the city to complete their day to day activities. These days, there is an ongoing debate between people that should it be discouraged to use private cars and encourage people to use other means of transport such as bicycles and the subways. In this essay, I will provide my point of view by analyzing both sides of the arguments.
Private cars are being used for transportation as it is the easiest possible way for those who have it. Though, if each person has his own private car then it will create other more severe problems. For instance, more private cars mean more traffic on the road which eventually causes more pollution. Moreover, more resources like oil will be consumed if the number of private car usage is increased. Hence, authorities need to discourage citizens from using private cars.
Those who argue that other means of transports should be used have a different view and say that it is actually a good thing. It is claimed that transport such as bicycles, skates are very healthy activities. For example, according to a study people who rid bicycle and skates have fewer chances of heart disease and obesity. Moreover, the use of subway is another mean of transportation which in fact the reason for sharing resources.
In a nutshell, it is a good approach to discourage citizens from using private cars and rather encourage them to use other means of health transport such as bicycles, skates etc.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, hence, if, moreover, so, then, for example, for instance, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1271.0 1207.87684729 105% => OK
No of words: 260.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88846153846 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66496833246 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 401.4 379.143842365 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.5684058789 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.7333333333 104.977214359 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.9669160288 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 7.25397266985 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.466135965374 0.242375264174 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151963838619 0.0925447433944 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.151907795615 0.071462118173 213% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.321430038734 0.151781067708 212% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1594849877 0.0609392437508 262% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 12.6369458128 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.1260098522 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.9458128079 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.5310837438 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.32886699507 94% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 55.0591133005 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.