Should governments spend more money on improving roads and highways, or should governments spend more money on improving public transportation (busies, trains, subways)? Why? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience?
In this modern era, there is an ongoing deliberation among people about the positive and negative impacts on the society due to the government role in public transportation improvements and improvements of public roads and subways. It is possible to claim that the best thing to develop as transportation, my point of view that the highway and road construction outweigh public transportation development. In this essay, I shall explain my point of view, while analyzing the benefits of the development of the road construction.
First and foremost, there are myriad of benefits all of us can gain because of the public road development. Nowadays, most of the people have their private vehicles, but they use public transportation, because of the lack of quality on the roads. If the government develop public roads in a scientific way, most of the people use their private vehicles in their day-to-day life. Because of the above point, it is taken into account that the road construction as the first and best way to develop a country.
On the other hand, those who believe public transportation as the best way to develop a country have a different view and say, cities will develop because of the quality of the public transport system. For example, the Republic of China has developed a motor coach system among cities in a high-quality way. Therefore, some people believed the best case for transportation development. In anyhow, before the development of public transport in China, they have developed their road network in a methodical manner.
In conclusion, it is believed that the highways and normal city road network have the highest priority for developing by a government. It is strongly believed, that the professional’s and government interference is essential to develop a high-quality road network first in a highly efficient manner.
- Company Top level Authorities should or should not take employees suggestions orideas to take any decisions. Discuss 77
- It is important to maintain a right balance of your work and other respects of one’s life such as family and leisure sport. What is your opinion about this? Discuss with appropriate examples. 75
- In order to study effectively, it requires comfort, peace and time. So, it is impossible FOR A STUDENT to combine learning and employment at the same time, because one distracts the other. To what extent do you agree with this statement? Support your opin 88
- Positive and negative impact of information through Mass Media. Discuss your opinion. 85
- Do you think design of buildings have positive or negative impact. Which way it can effect on work and live?” 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 287, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a scientific way" with adverb for "scientific"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... If the government develop public roads in a scientific way, most of the people use their private v...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 490, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a methodical manner" with adverb for "methodical"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... they have developed their road network in a methodical manner. In conclusion, it is believed that ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 31.9359605911 141% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 5.75862068966 347% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 301.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20598006645 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18861425184 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46511627907 0.580463131201 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 486.0 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.6157635468 195% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1833077888 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.538461538 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1538461538 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38461538462 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126468760206 0.242375264174 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541656386508 0.0925447433944 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379542680279 0.071462118173 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0867658724494 0.151781067708 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300724496828 0.0609392437508 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 55.0591133005 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.