should school stop teaching handwriting entirely and focus instead on their typing skills? Is handwriting no longer relevant?
Recently, there is a compelling notion that whether schools should stop teaching handwriting entirely and focus on their typing skills has become a heated topic. Rather, handwriting is no longer relevant to children, hence digital devices are more common used in the future, it becomes even more controversial. In this essay I will elaborate both sides of argument ad close a logical conclusion at the end.
Stopping teaching handwriting in school is rather extreme emotional comment than an objective argument. Handwriting is an important skill in our daily life for example, handwriting allows us to drop a note to our family member or neighbour. It is a fast and efficient communication method. A tidy and clear handwriting helps to cut avoidable mistakes caused by miscommunication.
Despite handwriting skills is important in our daily communication, a fast speed and high accuracy typing skills are also playing critical role as well. Digital devices are highly being used in writing emails and essays. There is an undeniable argument that children are spending more time on typing on keyboards than handwriting during their educational period. Typing skills are essential for their education purposes.
As per my argument points mentioned above, I incline that both handwriting and typing skills are important to children for their educational and communication purposes. Neither skills should be under weighted in their learning process. Both skills should taught in their early age for their well being.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-01 | Carol Yuen | 77 | view |
| 2019-07-01 | Carol Yuen | 77 | view |
- This is important to preserve the beautiful buildings of the past. Even if it will be expensive to do so. To what extent do you agree or disagree with it. 77
- Medical technology can increase life expectancy, Is it a blessing or cursed? 77
- Some people think that experiential learning (learning by doing) can work well in formal education; however others think that traditional form of teaching is the best. Discuss whether or not you think experiential learning can work well in high school and 77
- Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or is it the responsibility of producers? 77
- Some people think that exercise is the key to health while others feel that having a balanced diet is more important. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, so, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 31.9359605911 72% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1288.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 236.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45762711864 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96058809581 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 139.433497537 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597457627119 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 394.2 379.143842365 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.23427344 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 104.977214359 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8571428571 20.9669160288 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.71428571429 7.25397266985 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.467103988687 0.242375264174 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14757763401 0.0925447433944 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117888104655 0.071462118173 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27702797451 0.151781067708 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0714368988173 0.0609392437508 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 53.1260098522 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.09 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.