Recently, the phenomenon of compulsory voting in some countries around the world or in a democratic society that come conclusions the nature of democracy and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that voting is compulsory in democratic societies or in some countries can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, conclusions the nature of democracy with compulsory voting in a democratic society or in some countries around the world can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, in some countries around the world or in a democratic society that voting is compulsory and the nature of democracy might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the nature of democracy in some countries around the world or in democratic societies which voting is compulsory far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues’ potential implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 31.9359605911 141% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1734.0 1207.87684729 144% => OK
No of words: 310.0 242.827586207 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5935483871 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23915945984 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535483870968 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 567.0 379.143842365 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.5024630542 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.5072049253 50.4703680194 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.636363636 104.977214359 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1818181818 20.9669160288 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.401042997837 0.242375264174 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151053019334 0.0925447433944 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147196278031 0.071462118173 206% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260259336826 0.151781067708 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405090110284 0.0609392437508 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 12.6369458128 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.14 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.54236453202 223% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.9458128079 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.12 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.3980295567 127% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.