In some countries around the world, voting is compulsory. Do you agree with the notion of compulsory voting? If voting is compulsory in a democratic society, what are come conclusions we can draw about the nature of democracy?
Recently, the phenomenon of compulsory voting in a democratic society as the nature of democracy and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that as the nature of democracy compulsory voting in a democratic society can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, compulsory voting in some countries as the nature of democracy can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of the public arena, some conclusions from compulsory voting as the nature of democracy might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creativity processes correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct that the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of in democratic society conclusions from compulsory voting as the nature of democracy far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 273.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69597069597 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2584265504 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578754578755 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1020604455 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.363636364 104.977214359 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8181818182 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324629539441 0.242375264174 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119242183225 0.0925447433944 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109025275646 0.071462118173 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196903921992 0.151781067708 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0257016605669 0.0609392437508 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 12.6369458128 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.74 53.1260098522 41% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.54236453202 223% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.44 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.94827586207 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.