In Some Countries round the world, Voting Is Compulsory. Do You Agree With The Notion Of Compulsory Voting?
Recently, the phenomenon of compulsory voting and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of enforcing people to participate in elections is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that study of having the election right in voting can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the notion of compulsory voting can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that stimulating political interests, as well as democratic society, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the influence of civic education on freedom of speech and voting age. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both civil rights and having the knowledge of legal requirements apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of voting right, compulsory voting might increase the consequences of civic duty. Moreover, fundamental aspects would relate to this reality that the demerits of democratic elections pertain to election results. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of infringing people rights negatively correlated with dictator government. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of being politically aware.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the drawbacks of compulsory voting its benefits. Not only do the advantages of civic communities prove the significance of democratic elections, but also pinpoint legal implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nterests, as well as democratic society, are inextricably bound up. According to ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 270.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6962962963 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20755281511 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625925925926 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6609371483 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.166666667 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234265736364 0.242375264174 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799633171924 0.0925447433944 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709616264958 0.071462118173 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135698285516 0.151781067708 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0268781001624 0.0609392437508 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.63 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.